Skip to content
UrbanScope

The Iconic Puzzle Game Couldn't Win at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification Could Fix That

Each time a significant prize-giving event nears, there’s always an outcry for introducing of new categories to honor unsung work and delight the passions of enthusiasts dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator made the case advocating for terror-themed awards. That would be fantastic. So would strategy board titles, representing a dedicated supporter's campaign. However, I must insist when I prioritize just as with other single-minded supporters, there's a strong justification for why my demand stands as crucial and important of all. Here's the proposal: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works defies precise measurement; it’s very subjective, and it will always generate discussions concluding with vague boundaries. This explains why movie academies steer clear of genre categories. But it is an unavoidable compromise within the realm of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range it's challenging to consider them a single creative category.

To recognize the complete range of achievement in video games to be recognized, and to ensure all game types to have a chance for representation, genre categories are essential.

Current Gaming Award Categories

Prominent interactive entertainment events presently include genre categories for Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these classifications successfully include numerous genres, making space possible for most games within them.

Not so for logic-based experiences. No suitable classification appears to put them. Examine these examples from outstanding current releases, each quite distinct: structural challenges of one title, intense tile-matching in a different title, thought-provoking social scenarios in another game. Where could they possibly go within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.

Acknowledgment Issues

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers launched regularly that have no home in entertainment awards, unless they happen to qualify classification types such as Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested small studio competitions.

  • A renowned logic title received no recognition in any category during that awards season
  • Another creative title received no nominations in 2019
  • A beloved organization game was overlooked that year
  • Only a few brain-teasers barely qualified for small studio or handheld classifications

Importance of Logic Titles

Frequently they represent modest productions, but the art of the puzzle game is of massive significance. Famous handheld logic titles count as most engaged experiences worldwide maintaining this status for many years.

The famous puzzle experience rivals popular creative games for the title of best-selling game of all time; it’s also in the running as greatest title ever. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks within interactive entertainment, and engaging with almost every other genre.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Puzzle games wouldn’t have this problem. It would be easy to populate multiple candidates with fascinating, diverse, deserving games every year with ease — or rather, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave numerous deserving experiences.

And to reiterate, these represent titles that otherwise have no home at major gaming awards. Logic title developers are working at the demanding boundary game development, producing among the purest expressions of gaming itself. Similar to cinema stunt performers, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay 35 years.

About the author

Julie Spencer

Urban planner and writer with 10+ years of experience in sustainable city design and community development projects across North America.

UrbanScope

Type to search articles.